Destroyer - OUTLET
Destroyer - OUTLET
Destroyer - OUTLET
Destroyer - OUTLET
Destroyer - OUTLET

Destroyer - OUTLET

An upgraded version of the modern mountaineering style backpack

Regular price Sale price$439.94 $549.92 20% OFF
/

SKU:

V69GY

Color
  • In stock, ready to ship
  • Inventory on the way

The Destroyer™ is an upgraded version of the modern mountaineering style backpack. Both top and front-loading capabilities makes getting to your gear a whole lot easier with a pack of this scale and the diaphragm system can separate the top and bottom compartments. Grapple Compression Straps™ keeps your gear tight to your body and also acts as a mounting system for sleeping pads, tents, or even a rifle.

Recommended For: 

  • Military Ruck | Adventure | Backpacking

Recommended Add-Ons:

PACK SPECS & FEATURES

TECHNICAL SPECS

  • Volume: 3900 c.i.
  • Weight: 7.50 lbs
  • Dimensions: 37.5H x 14W x 7.5D

PACK FEATURES

  • Top and front-loading capabilities
  • Grapple™ compression straps
  • Top organizational lid with mesh pouch for accessories
  • Includes stowaway rain cover
  • Interior clip for securing the 2L or 3L Source® hydration bladders
FIT & ADJUST YOUR PACK

Customer Reviews

Based on 65 reviews
94%
(61)
6%
(4)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
F
Frank P. (Indiana)
Destroyer pack

Amazing pack, can’t wait to use it this fall. Will be ordering other Eberlestock items soon!!!!

b
brandon

Amazing build quality . Great materials fast service

s
steve s. (California)
Way better than i even expected.

everything about it is next level. top flap fits a loaded sidecar style holster as well. really does make a heavy load feel like youre carrying HALF.

L
Li C.T. (Taipei City)
Experience using BATTLESHIP

This is my first long backpack. I used to use the US military system backpack (the type with two large auxiliary pockets on the left and right of the main bag).
Since there are no left or right side pockets, it will be more convenient to move around in the city, apartment, and elevator.
Its internal backrest system is very similar to the j79, but feels better than my favorite j79. I did not take out the inner back frame steel bars of the two backpacks to compare, but when adjusting the shoulder straps, you need to adjust the height first. When the steel bar is pulled out, you can see the shape of the steel bar. I think the steel bars and inner back frame of BATTLESHIP are better and more ergonomic than those of j79 (but I have been using j79 for two years and am very used to j79, although it is a bit long for me). Adjusted to the most correct back length, the shoulder strap adjustment ladder has been adjusted down to the lowest) but I still like j79. BATTLESHIP can be adjusted to the exact length of my back (technically speaking, it's still half a square off, j79 (one less square)), but I think I'm an exception because my height is only 171 cm, and BATTLESHIP has the latest type of belt. , making it more integrated with my body.
After buying a few backpacks, my experience is that my height and body type are better suited to the mid-sized backpacks designed by Eberlestock.
I will consider buying BATTLESHIP because I want to use it to match the US military's cfp 90 and libe backpacks. I have not used such backpacks yet. I want to practice using this type of backpack and test it out to find out what conditions work best for me. I live in Taipei, Taiwan, which is a modern city full of alleys. And the basin is surrounded by mountains. In this case the j51 is too wide (I usually use the j51 when I need to move items)
I don't have enough experience with backpacks. It takes six months to a year to use it repeatedly. If I had longer experience I would be better able to share.
But I like the solid workmanship of BATTLESHIP, it looks handsome, and the inner back frame structure feels better than j79. I love every military backpack from Eberlestock.

J
Joe G. (Connecticut)
Excellent pack

Fit me with little adjustment right out of the box, I’m 6’2” around 195 lbs. This is my first Eberlestock order and it seems like very durable construction. Have yet to field test it, but I expect it to perform well.

J
John F. (Washington)
Great Bag!

My only reason for 4 is that the hydration bladders are too big for the pockets

B
Brandon

Great product. Perfect size.